Toggle Content Toggle Content

Donate

 0%

Social Bookmarking


Quote

"Have not prisons - which kill all will and force of character in man, which enclose within their walls more vices than are met with on any other spot of the globe - always been universities of crime?"

- Peter Kropotkin

Menu

Home

Blogs
Calender
Contact Us
Downloads
Link to Us
Multimedia
Personal Pages
Store
Surveys
Tell a Friend
Wiki

News

News
Stories Archive
Submit News
Topics

• Community

Photo Gallery
Groups

• Members options

Friends
My Account

Forums

Forums

Search

Search
Forums
Coppermine

• Web

Statistics
Top 25

Chomsky: "Students should be Anarchists"

Thursday, September 01, 2011 (02:38:10)
Sources: Workers Solidarity Movement, IndyBay, ZEIT (German)

NOTE: This has been translated from German to English, and I'd imagine Chomsky's quotes were translated from English to German and back to English. I have asked Chomsky whether these quotes are more or less accurate and he has confirmed them. Though he has stated they are obviously translated.

STUDENTS SHOULD BECOME ANARCHISTS

Excerpt:

ZEIT Campus: You often say you are an anarchist. What do you mean by that?

Chomsky: Anarchists try to identify power structures. They urge those exercising power to justify themselves. This justification does not succeed most of the time. Then anarchists work at unmasking and mastering the structures, whether they involve patriarchal families, a Mafia international system or the private tyrannies of the economy, the corporation.

ZEIT Campus: What was the key experience that made you an anarchist?

Chomsky: There was none. When I was twelve years old, I began to go to secondhand bookshops. Many of them were run by anarchists who came from Spain. Therefore it seemed very natural to me to be an anarchist.

ZEIT Campus: Should all students become anarchists?

Chomsky: Yes. Students should challenge authorities and join a long anarchist tradition.

ZEIT Campus: “Challenge authorities” – a liberal or a moderate leftist could accept that invitation.

Chomsky: As soon as one identifies, challenges and overcomes illegitimate power, he or she is an anarchist. Most people are anarchists. What they call themselves doesn’t matter to me.

Howard Zinn's "The People Speak" to Air on History

Thursday, December 03, 2009 (20:37:14)
Get The People Speak Extended Edition DVD when it becomes available.

On Sunday, December 13, at 8 PM Eastern and Pacific / 7 PM Central, THE PEOPLE SPEAK -- the long awaited documentary film inspired by Howard Zinn's books A People's History of the United States and, with Anthony Arnove, Voices of a People's History -- will air on History.


AnarchismToday.org Multimedia: Howard Zinn's "The People Speak" Trailer


Tune in! Details at www.history.com/peoplespeak

or text peoplespeak to HISTRY (447879) for tune in info.

You can also catch the final stop of the People Speak College Tour at UCLA -- with Josh Brolin and Chris Moore -- Friday, December 2, at 2 pm.
www.history.com/conten...llege-tour

ABOUT THE PEOPLE SPEAK

Using dramatic and musical performances of the letters, diaries and speeches of everyday Americans, the documentary feature film THE PEOPLE SPEAK gives voice to those who spoke up for social change throughout U.S. history, forging a nation from the bottom up with their insistence on equality and justice.

Narrated by acclaimed historian Howard Zinn and based on his best-selling books, A People's History of the United States and, with Anthony Arnove, Voices of a People's History, THE PEOPLE SPEAK illustrates the relevance of these passionate historical moments to our society today and reminds us never to take liberty for granted.

THE PEOPLE SPEAK is produced by Matt Damon, Josh Brolin, Chris Moore, Anthony Arnove, and Howard Zinn, co-directed by Moore, Arnove and Zinn, and features dramatic and musical performances by Allison Moorer, Benjamin Bratt, Bob Dylan, Bruce Springsteen, Chris Robinson, Christina Kirk, Danny Glover, Darryl "DMC" McDaniels, David Strathairn, Don Cheadle, Eddie Vedder, Harris Yulin, Jasmine Guy, John Legend, Josh Brolin, Kathleen Chalfant, Kerry Washington, Lupe Fiasco, Marisa Tomei, Martín Espada, Matt Damon, Michael Ealy, Mike O'Malley, Morgan Freeman, Q'orianka Kilcher, Reg E. Cathey, Rich Robinson, Rosario Dawson, Sandra Oh, Staceyann Chin, and Viggo Mortensen.

Classical Composer Honors Noam Chomsky with Original Music

Thursday, November 19, 2009 (14:29:14)

Noam Chomsky will be honored at an MIT concert, to be held on January 22, 2010, at Kresge Auditorium. The Los Angeles-based composer Edward Manukyan will be present with the famous linguist and philosopher, to hear performances of chamber music - some of which were dedicated to Prof. Chomsky - and songs on Chomsky's words.

The event is part of a series of concerts in which the composer honors some of the world's leading intellectuals and scientists with musical dedications. Similar concerts will follow in New York and Texas, honoring the Nobel-laureate biologist James Watson and physicist Steven Weinberg later next year.

The concert will also feature speeches about Chomsky and his contribution to science and world ideas, by noted scientists from MIT and Harvard.

More about the concert is available from: www.EdwardManukyan.com

Tickets are on sale at: sao.mit.edu/tickets/20...al-tribute

Freedom of Religion in Libertarian Spain

Friday, October 30, 2009 (23:10:13)
Freedom of Religion in Libertarian Spain
By Nicholas Evans
Part 2 of the ‘Libertarian Spain in the 1930’s’ series*

Libertarianism** (aka anarchism) has always been known as a movement that generally prefers various kinds of democratic socialist economies. 1. These same socialist economies are based, in the opinion of libertarians, on realistic and practical amounts of human freedom. 2.

As Kropotkin states,

All Libertarians uniquely prefer the “enfranchisement of man from … the state as well as from those of capitalism.” 3.

Human freedom for everyone includes freedom of religion.

This is why we find the major writers in the libertarian Mutualist, Collectivist, and Communist schools supporting religious freedom.

Proudhon, a Mutualist, and the libertarian of small businessmen and co-operative businesses states***:

“Let public worship, like industry, be free… The right to assemble for prayer is equal to the right to assemble to talk politics or economics;…” 4.

Bakunin, a collectivist, and libertarian of self employed and large scale democratically controlled industry, mentions:

“Neither society, nor any part of society- commune, province, or nation- has the right to prevent free individuals from associating freely for any purpose whatsoever: political, religious, scientific, artistic…” 5.

Alexander Berkman, the Libertarian Communist, wrote:

“Maybe you are a Christian, or a member of some other religion -Jew, Mormon, Mohammedan, Buddhist, or what not… It makes no difference. A man should be free to believe whatever he pleases.” 6.

Benjamin Tucker, Libertarian Individualist (aka free market socialist, see his State Socialism and Anarchism) notes on religion:

While most Libertarians are atheists, “… the anarchists none less firmly believe in the liberty to believe in it.” 7.

Writers who prefer gatherer-hunter lifestyles such as John Zerzan and Freddy Perlman mention favorably hunter-gatherer bands with spiritual beliefs. 8.

And of course there are excellent Catholic Libertarians such as Dorthy Day and Catholic Libertarian influenced groups such as Catholic Worker. 9.

Anarchist Arrested for Tweeting

Wednesday, October 07, 2009 (18:34:54)
Source: Amy Goodman's Column

Watch What You Tweet

A social worker from New York City was arrested last week while in Pittsburgh for the G-20 protests, then subjected to an FBI raid this week at home -- all for using Twitter. Elliot Madison faces charges of hindering apprehension or prosecution, criminal use of a communication facility and possession of instruments of crime. He was posting to a Twitter feed (or tweeting, as it is called) publicly available information about police activities around the G-20 protests, including information about where police had issued orders to disperse.

While alerting people to public information may not seem to be an arrestable offense, be forewarned: Many people have been arrested for the same "crime" -- in Iran, that is.

Last June 20, as Iranians protested against the conduct and results of their national election, President Barack Obama said in a statement, "The universal rights to assembly and free speech must be respected, and the United States stands with all who seek to exercise those rights."

His statement was released in English, Farsi and Arabic and posted on the White House's very own Twitter feed. His tweet read, "We call on the Iranian government to stop all violent and unjust actions against its own people."

Read more...


Source: Democracy Now!:

Twitter Crackdown: NYC Activist Arrested for Using Social Networking Site during G-20 Protest in Pittsburgh


"Elliot Madison was arrested last month during the G-20 protests in Pittsburgh when police raided his hotel room. Police say Madison and a co-defendant used computers and a radio scanner to track police movements and then passed on that information to protesters using cell phones and the social networking site Twitter. Madison is being charged with hindering apprehension or prosecution, criminal use of a communication facility, and possession of instruments of crime. Exactly one week later, Madison’s New York home was raided by FBI agents, who conducted a sixteen-hour search. We speak to Elliot Madison and his attorney, Martin Stolar.
...
SHARIF ABDEL KOUDDOUS: For our first segment, we turn to a case of a New York activist who’s believed to be among the first to face criminal charges for communicating electronically with protesters about police actions. Elliot Madison was arrested last month during the G-20 protests in Pittsburgh when police raided his hotel room. Police say Madison and a co-defendant used computers and a radio scanner to track police movements and then passed on that information to protesters using cell phones and the social networking site Twitter. Madison is being charged with hindering apprehension or prosecution, criminal use of a communication facility, and possession of instruments of crime.

Exactly one week later, Madison’s New York home was raided by FBI agents, who conducted a sixteen-hour search. The agents seized items including computers, clothing, books and the records of Madison’s clients in his job as a social worker. Madison has since won a temporary order barring agents from examining his seized property.

For more, Elliot Madison joins us here in the firehouse studio. We’re also joined by his attorney, Martin Stolar..."

Read More...


Source: Ars Technica:

Anarchist arrested after tweeting out the fuzz to protesters

"If you're the subversive type, you might want to reconsider tweeting the revolution. One Twitter user has been arrested and had his home raided after he allegedly used the service to help others commit crimes, though he may have just been directing them to be cautious during their protests.
...
Though the FBI says so, it's not entirely clear from the complaint that Madison's tweets were actually illegal. Madison's lawyer told the New York Times on Saturday that he and a friend were merely "part of a communications network among people protesting the G-20." As implied through the Times piece, Madison's tweets merely directed protestors as to where the police were at any given time and to stay alert. "There’s absolutely nothing that he’s done that should subject him to any criminal liability."

No matter: the FBI followed up on Madison's arrest by searching his home late last week for evidence of other violations, such as rioting laws and whatever else they could dig up. Not only did investigators seize his computers, they also took books, clothing, gas masks, and apparently a photo of Lenin. As a self-described anarchist, Madison's affiliations have undoubtedly contributed to police opinion of him and his activities, no matter how benign."

Read more...

WWW.ANARCHO-PUNK.NET -- download ~2000 anarchopunk albums

Saturday, August 29, 2009 (16:57:17)
I thought this could interest some of you, so i'm sharing the information here.

www.anarcho-punk.net is a new online community and anarcho music sharing forum. We just opened to the "general public" and you are welcome to join this new and growing community!

NEARLY 2,000 ANARCHO-PUNK ALBUMS ARE AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD !!!!

We are an international and multi-lingual community for anarcho-punks from all around the world.
The website is available in over 20 different languages, and we offer a variety of language-specific forums for non-english-speaking peoples.

Ward Churchill Denied Bid to Return to University of Colorado

Wednesday, July 08, 2009 (21:36:42)
Source: Democracy Now! Headlines for July 8, 2009

Ward Churchill Denied Bid to Return to University of Colorado

In Denver, a judge has denied former University of Colorado Professor Ward Churchill’s bid to return to his old job despite a jury’s finding he was wrongfully dismissed. Churchill sued the school after he was fired from a tenured position on charges of research misconduct. But Churchill maintains that the allegations were a pretext to remove him for his political beliefs. In April, a jury ruled in Churchill’s favor and ordered the school to pay his attorney fees. But on Tuesday, Chief Judge Larry Naves of Denver District Court said university officials are legally protected from Churchill’s bid to reverse his firing because they were acting as judicial officers. Churchill says he plans to appeal. His lawyer, David Lane said: “This is judicial activism in its worst form… a jury said Ward Churchill’s free speech was violated, and yet Judge Naves goes on for almost 50 pages, saying in so many words, ‘Too bad.’”

Free Multimedia is Coming and the FUDing has Begun...

Thursday, June 25, 2009 (16:51:06)
FUD, for those who are unaware, is an acronym for "Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt." Instilling FUD in people has often been a tactic of proprietary vendors, seeking to scare their customer-base away from other vendors or freer, non-proprietary alternatives. It has often been used to describe Microsoft's tactics of denigrating free and open source solutions, for example. Essentially it is a scare-tactic which operates on people's fear and ignorance.

Ogg Theora and Ogg Vorbis are emerging technologies used for compressing video and audio, respectively. The Ogg formats are free and open formats that do not belong to any particular corporation, nor do they require any royalties to use.

As it stands, most video sites on the internet require proprietary browser plugins to be installed, for example Flash, or RealVideo. The fact that the Ogg formats are free, however, means that support can be built right in to the web browser. Mozilla Firefox, among others, has announced that they plan to support the Ogg formats right out of the box in the upcoming version 3.5. At one point, Ogg was expected to become part of the HTML5 standard.

For more details on HTML 5, Ogg, test videos, and what this could mean for the future of the internet, read my blog post titled, "Free Video is Coming to the Internet."

A few big names have jumped on the bandwagon to support Ogg, such as Dailymotion, Wikipedia, and Mozilla. Some media sites, like Democracy Now! and Archive.org, have already been using Ogg Theora for years.

Not everyone has been so supportive though...

Interview with El Libertario (Venezuela – June 2009)

Wednesday, June 24, 2009 (14:42:14)
* From Madrid the anarchist group Star, linked to the Iberian Federation of Anarchists Youths (Federación Ibérica de Juventudes Anarquistas-FIJA-), has raised questions whose answers will let us know today and in detail what is doing and saying the known Venezuelan anarchist newspaper.

- Anarchist group Star (GS) - Could you start talking about your project?

º El Libertario is a newspaper published since 1995 (56 issues from then to June-2009). We try to report on anarchist theory and practice in Latin America and the world, as well as support any libertarian aspect within the social movements we find in our field. We do not receive, nor do we want to receive, any subsidy from the State or other instance of hierarchical power. Our activity is 110% self-managed. This spokesman is based on the anti-authoritarian ideal of anarchism and is promoted by the Collective Editor of El Libertario, an affinity group open to participation and collaboration of people with libertarian principles and attitudes, in an atmosphere of mutual respect and non-dogmatism. The central criterion of affinity is to share the anarchist ideal for building a society based on direct democracy, social justice, self-management, mutual support and self-contract without the authoritarian imposition of the law or force; between other values. Apart from being a propaganda group, we try to promote the existence of a libertarian movement in our country, but for this we presupposes that there must be a number of grass-roots social movements, autonomous and belligerent, as a requisite for the expansion of libertarian ideas and practices in our environment. For that reason we linked to various grass-roots social organizations, accompanied them in their struggle against hierarchical power, and for the human rights. Also, some of us do research work and theoretical reflection. We also encourage tasks to promote a culture of self-management, such as audio-visual samples and talks, and the First Libertarian Book and Video Fair, scheduled for November 2009. Finally, to the extent of our affinities and possibilities, we get involved in campaigns like the one held last year for the 20 years of the slaughter in El Amparo. More details on us, how we act and what we think, in our web: www.nodo50.org/ellibertario (in Spanish, English & other languages), and in the print editions of the newspaper.
  • Posted by: Anonymous
  • Topic: Venezuela
  • Score: 0 / 5

Campaign against the assassination of workers in Venezuela

Friday, June 19, 2009 (19:59:33)
* El Libertario www.nodo50.org/ellibertario has joined this campaign and we’re trying to divulge this initiative in an attempt to confront the hired killers that are taking the lives of labor activists in this country.

Enough killings and repression of workers in struggle!

This past May 5 union leader Argenis Vasquez, organizing secretary in the union at Toyota’s plant in Cumana, was gunned down by thugs as he left his house. This assassination occurred just after a month-long strike demanding improvements. The murdered worker was a leader of the protest and key in confrontations with the company and the management. It all looks like the unofficial “answer” by a company unable to impose its will on the strikers.

However, not even three months have passed since the deaths of workers Pedro Suarez and Javier Marcano in Anzoategui, in the eastern part of the country, during a violent repression by the regional police ordered by Governor Tarek William Saab as they tried to evict workers from that other Japanese transnational Mitsubishi Motors. The workers were occupying the factory as protest against the firing of 135 workers and for their demands.

These killings come on top of the horrible assassination of the three main leaders of the Union Nacional de Trabajadores –UNT (National Workers Union) in the state of Aragua, also at the hand of thugs who gunned them down this past November 27 in the vicinity of La Encrucijada. They were Richard Gallego, president of UNT’s regional section, Luis Hernandez, union leader at Pepsi-Cola and Carlos Requena, union delegate at Produvisa, all members of political party Unidad Socialista de Izquierda –USI (Left Socialist Union). These labor leaders were at the head of the union in a state with one of the largest rates of labor conflict in the country, leading the struggle in solidarity with workers who occupied the Colombian transnational Lacteos Alpina due to threats of lock-down and facing harsh repression by the regional police (then under the direction of Governor Didalco Bolivar).
  • Posted by: Anonymous
  • Topic: Venezuela
  • Score: 0 / 5

The British leave Iraq! 18 years too late...

Monday, May 04, 2009 (18:37:46)
The British troops have finally left Iraq. This is an historic moment. The British involvement in the 18-year slaughter is finally over.

Many political commentators are now congratulating the British involvement in Iraq, especially the surge of 2007, for its success in lifting the Iraqis out of their dreadful living conditions into something a little better. This is just wilful ignorance: these dreadful conditions were imposed on Iraqis by the British and American invasion.

Bush and Blair went into Iraq saying they were going to win the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people. But how can anyone speak highly of the war now that the hearts and minds of over a million Iraqis have been splattered on the ground? Yes, over a million. The British research-polling agency, Opinion Research Business, estimates the figure of Iraqi deaths at 1.2 million. This would be the logical follow on from the highly commended study by Johns Hopkins University in the US and al-Mustansiriya University in Baghdad in 2006, which calculated that 650,000 Iraqis had died as a result of the invasion. The scale of deaths caused by the invasion may well have significantly passed the scale of deaths in the Rwanda genocide.

Iraq currently has the highest cancer rate of any region in history. The cancer rate is higher than it was Vietnam after America sprayed about 12 million gallons of napalm over the entire country. It is even higher than in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the aftermath of the atomic bombs! This cancer rate is a result of British and American troops firing depleted uranium shells – a weapon of mass destruction - in Iraq. Weren’t we informed that we had to overthrow Saddam Hussein because he was brutal enough to use weapons of mass destruction against the Iraqis?

Joseph Chamie, an Iraq specialist at the UN, says that in terms of poverty Iraq is now looking “more and more like a country in Sub-Saharan Africa,” the poorest region in the world.

Origins of May Day (International Workers Day)

Friday, May 01, 2009 (17:48:55)
From Wikipedia:

"May Day occurs on May 1 and refers to the Haymarket affair or any of several public holidays. In many countries, May Day is synonymous with International Workers' Day, or Labour Day, which celebrates the social and economic achievements of the labour movement."

More on the Haymarket affair from Wikipedia:

"The Haymarket affair (also known as the Haymarket riot or Haymarket massacre) was a disturbance that took place on Tuesday May 4, 1886, at the Haymarket Square in Chicago, and began as a rally in support of striking workers. An unknown person threw a bomb at police as they dispersed the public meeting. The bomb blast and ensuing gunfire resulted in the deaths of eight police officers and an unknown number of civilians. In the internationally publicized legal proceedings that followed, eight anarchists were tried for murder. Four were put to death, and one committed suicide in prison.

The Haymarket affair is generally considered to have been an important influence on the origin of international May Day observances for workers."

Pirates and Emperors

Thursday, April 30, 2009 (14:34:52)
The maxim of Thucydides was that “large nations do what they wish, while small nations accept what they must.” This is how international affairs work today. A striking case right now is the piracy off the coast of Somalia.

Throughout the last few weeks the mainstream media has been informing us that a Somali teenage pirate named Abdiwali Abdiqadir Muse has been put on trial for piracy charges in the United States. But it has almost entirely neglected the causes behind the surge in piracy. This piracy is simply portrayed to be a result of Somalia’s “anarchic political situation spilling out into the sea.” (From the guardian) Let us forget the gross misrepresentation of anarchism and focus the reason for the surge in piracy.

Johann Hari of the Independent is the only mainstream journalist to present some background to the situation. He describes how, “In 1991, the government of Somalia collapsed. Its nine million people have been teetering on starvation ever since – and the ugliest forces in the Western world have seen this as a great opportunity to steal the country's food supply and dump our nuclear waste in their seas.”

This collapse came as a result of American policy towards Somalia. In the 1980’s, Ronald Reagan’s America supplied the dictator Mohamed Siad Barre with arms and about $100 million a year. As is common with dictators, this money didn’t trickle down to the people of Somalia and the country became increasingly poor. The money was used, however, to repress the population. So it did trickle down in one way. Barre’s brutal policies led to an uprising against him, which quickly turned into a full-scale civil war after he was ousted, and a famine ensued.

America, then under George Bush I, withheld aid for 2 months, during which about 100,000 Somalis died of starvation. Now that Somalia was in a huge crisis, Bush took the opportunity to declare, just before the election, that he was dedicated to helping the starving people of Somalia and ordered a “humanitarian” invasion. These policies led to the political collapse of Somalia. European powers saw this as a great opportunity for exploitation.

Somalia has continued to be damaged by American foreign policy. In recent times the Bush II administration destroyed the charity that provided the main support for Somalia on the grounds that it was involved in terrorism. They later conceded that it wasn’t.

After Somalia’s political collapse mysterious ships started to show up off the coast. These ships are owned by private companies, often the Italian mafia, who have been paid by European governments to dispose of their nuclear waste. They have been dumping this waste off the coast of Somalia. So far more than 300 Somalis have died of radiation poisoning.

This is not the only way that European ships have raped the coast of Somalia. According to investigative journalist Jeremy Scahill, “Over $300 million worth of tuna, shrimp, and lobster are being stolen every year by illegal trawlers off Somalia’s coast.”

Because of this, many of the local fishermen are starving and Somalia has been pushed further into the abyss of political instability that starvation brings.

It was the combination of fish theft and nuclear dumping that led the “pirates” to take to the seas. Somali fishermen started taking speedboats out to sea to try and stop, or at least tax, boats that were stealing their fish or dumping the toxic waste. They call themselves the volunteer coastguard of Somalia and they have the support of the majority of Somalis – 70 percent according to WardheerNews (an independent news site in Somalia).

Unfortunately, some of the volunteer coastguards have turned into gangsters and have begun to take hostages, go beyond Somali waters and capture innocent ships like the one carrying world food program supplies. Trying to justify himself, one of the leaders of the pirates, Sugule Ali, has said that, "We don’t consider ourselves sea bandits. We consider sea bandits those who illegally fish in our seas and dump waste in our seas and carry weapons in our seas.”

In “The City of God”, St. Augustine tells the story of a pirate captured by Alexander the Great, who asked him “how dare he molest the sea?”
“How dare you molest the whole world” the pirate replied. “Because I do it with a little ship only, I am called a thief; you, doing it with a great navy, are called an emperor”.

The governments of the United States and of many of the European countries, including Britain, did not care when Somalis were starving to death in the hundreds of thousands. They took this opportunity to dispose of their nuclear waste and to steal fish to make up for the overfishing that has taken place on their own coasts. But now that Somalis have got desperate and have started disrupting one of the world’s most important oil ways, these governments – the emperors of our world – are suddenly keenly interested in Somalia.

Abdiwali is currently on trial for piracy. But surely, the European governments and the companies who have been stealing the Somalis’ fish and dumping nuclear waste in their seas should stand trial with him. As should the American politicians who supported Siad Barre against the wishes of the people of Somalia, withheld aid for 2 months during a famine and destroyed a charity giving aid to the desperate Somalis. Unless this happens we will continue to live in a corrupt world of pirates and emperors.

Venezuela: El Libertario warns of possible sentence to the 14 SIDOR workers

Thursday, April 30, 2009 (14:33:50)
* After taking part in a demonstration for lack of job security in 2006, 14 workers of contractor “Transportes Camila de SIDOR” could be sentenced to 5 to 10 years in jail.

In 05 September 2006 a group of workers and union leaders staged a protest against the carrier Camila, a contractor to SIDOR (Siderurgic of the Orinoco), the principal steel core business located in Puerto Ordaz, Bolivar state, in Venezuela. The workers were protesting the failure to pay wages, and maintain health and safety, as well as the lack of tools to accomplish their work. The protest was endorsed by Readers of the “Sindicato Único de Trabajadores Siderúrgicos y Similares" (Sutiss, the SIDOR`s union), stopping the equipment whose breakdowns and lack of maintenance represented a threat to the integrity of the workers, following the safety procedures in the labor standards. The employers turned to the regional authorities, getting the Public Ministry to issue an arrest warrant against three syndical leaders and a group of workers by the National Guard, which resulted in a protest by workers of the steel mill.

In this way were arrested Leonel Grisette, a member of the Commission who represents 50% workers and 50% of employers on Sutiss; Juan Valor, Secretary of Press and Propaganda, and Jhoel Hernández, Secretary of Culture and Sports of that union. The charges against them were qualified misappropriation and restricting the freedom to work. A trial started for acts defined as crimes after the reform of the Venezuelan Penal Code (Articles 358 to 363) in 2005, and the promulgation of the Organic Law of National Security (Article 56) in 2002: both approved during the Bolivarian government and harmful to the right to strike. The three union leaders, along with 11 workers, 14 of Sidor, have been subjected since 2006 to court procedures, while the trial will end on Wednesday April 29 2009, with the possibility of a sentence of between 5 and 10 years in prison.

Remember that SIDOR was nationalized by President Hugo Chávez in April 2008, following the revocation of the contract with the Argentina transnational Techint. However, a year later, estate control has not meant an improvement in the quality of life of the workers. Speaking to “El Libertario”, Leonel Grisette said "It is not true that outsourcing has been eliminated and working conditions of the flexible workers are such that they cause accidents in 4 to 1 ratio with respect to the other workers. Collective bargaining is frozen, and despite the absence of technical safety workers as required by law, we are forced to work under irregular conditions". Moreover, nationalization has neutralized the current board of Sutiss, which has abandoned the 14 workers on trial, so they had to pay out of their own pockets the fees for their counsel, which add up to 100 million bolivars (over $ 44,000).

Human rights and labor organizations have been denouncing the criminalization of protest in Venezuela, as well as the enactement of laws to restrict the legal right to strike, such as the requirements to present themselves in court and the threat of application of the Code Criminal Law and Security of the Nation. For anarchists the legal architecture of repression is part of the government offensive to end the belligerant autonomy of social organizations, with the excuse of fighting coups d'etat and under the rhetorical mask of Bolivarian Socialism, whose consequences are suffered by the people. Although the syndical organizations split and biased within the inter-bourgeois confrontation that has occurred in the country in recent years- do not keep statistics on cases similar to the 14 SIDOR, workers in the states of Carabobo, Aragua, Miranda and Tachira have been subject to presenting themselves in the courts. In this sense statements by the peasant movement Jirajara, located in the state of Yaracuy have counted 103 cases of peasants who after participating in protests and land occupations, have been referred to the courts. For the union activists of the 14 of SIDOR, these procedures are designed to decapitate the militant labor movement, so the possible penalty of 5 or 10 years imprisonment is a warning to other activists and advocates for labor and social rights.

Historically the libertarians have argued that the people will not feel better if the stick who beats them bears the name of stick of the people. We alert the base organizations and collectives of Venezuela and of the world about the potential sentence against the 14 SIDOR. As anarchists members of El Libertario we stand in solidarity with the Venezuelan workers struggling for their rights, we support militant, honest and autonomous unions and will continue to denounce the contradictions of an authoritarian government at the service of the interests of globalized capitalism in the struggle for a self-managed and revolutionary grass-roots alternative preferable to the false polarization which exists in our country.

El Libertario
ellibertario@nodo50.org
www.nodo50.org/ellibertario (in Spanish, English & others languages)
Caracas, April 27 2009.
  • Posted by: Anonymous
  • Topic: Venezuela
  • Score: 0 / 5

Cuba: The hurt of no longer being

Thursday, April 30, 2009 (14:32:04)
* Fragment from a work by Daniel Barret about the evolution of Cuba’s political regime since November 17 2005 till today. This piece attempts to place the role of Fidel Castro these past months.

Talking about a political regime so dependent on its tribal totem pole, it is not surprising that a fundamental chapter of its trajectory is about Fidel Castro; “commander in chief” by his own guerrilla merits and per saecula saeculorum. Fidel seemed to be dead but not buried back on January 11 2009 and very few dared to speak of missing him too much. By then he had already stopped his Reflexiones for some time and didn’t show much interest in appearing in person during visits by foreign leaders such as Rafael Correa of Ecuador and Martín Torrijos of Panama. Crowning the situation that very same day, in one of his periodic medical reports, a visibly moved Hugo Chávez said the following: “We know that the Fidel that walked streets and villages with his warrior image, in his uniform, hugging people, will not come back”. To finish by saying: “He will remain in our remembrances, because Fidel will live on, as he is alive today, and will live forever, past the physical life. And he must live – he knows it- many years”. That seemed like a poetic epitaph, the product of Hugo Chávez’s proverbial incontinence, who perhaps could not help offering the world such delicacies. But what Chávez probably didn’t take into account at that moment was the decision by the Cuban political rulers regarding the immortality of its icon and thus had to backtrack suddenly and announce amid drum rolls that Fidel was “very much alive”.

The situation was on stand-by several days until the snobbism and smarminess of Cristina Fernández de Kirchner set things in their place or out of their place. Using and abusing her prerogatives as a lady, according to the official explanations, she insisted on having an interview with history, even if it was with Tut-ankh-amon’s mummy: whereas the visitors to the Louvre Museum have their picture taken next to the Victory of Samotracia, she could not bypass adding to her collection of souvenirs a graphic illustration of her encounter with a revived Fidel Castro. Fidel, [1] in a majestic gesture of gallantry, accepted without hesitation the rendez-vous proposed by the extravagant amazon and put aside his self-imposed internal ostracism. There were some doubts and contradictions with respect to the duration of this encounter, but the truth is that it happened “officially” and was followed by mutual admiration, besides taking a photograph lacking in technical quality but which showed a Fidel somewhat shrunk but with more weight and aplomb than in his previous appearance in front of the cameras. And, since it was about ladies, if Fidel had met with Cristina Fernández he should also meet with Michelle Bachelet. Things got somewhat complicated in this instance since the “writer in chief” committed the faux pas of saying in writing that he had already informed the Chilean president of his taking sides in favor of Bolivia in the contentious Chile-Bolivia conflict; something that –as was said as an excuse- would not be too important coming from the lips of somebody who doesn’t occupy any position in Cuba’s state structure but who is barely the first secretary and undisputable leader of the only political party with legality in those lands. Michelle Bachelet took notice by saying that she had already communicated her displeasure to the real Cuban president and it all blew away as a passing upheaval and without visible consequences since the problems between Bolivia and Chile would be resolved by those countries themselves while Fidel –to the further chagrin of his large herd of unconditional and rueful sycophants- would not be invited to take part in any tribunal that would eventually rule on this conflict.

The pageantry of presidential visitors would not stop here. Right away, Guatemala’s Alvaro Colom entered the scene, carrying, as homage to the illustrious convalescent, the highest distinction awarded by his country: the Order of Quetzal in the degree of Grand Collar. The world gasped, perhaps waiting for the “commander” in person, acting coherently with his past, to recommend that Colom stuff the Order in the anatomical parts where the sun doesn’t shine. But fortunately, this didn’t happen: Fidel simply gave thanks for the distinction received by Raúl as his representative while at the same time Raúl clarified that his brother could not socialize with whomever came to Havana and that such privilege was the exclusive prerogative of female presidents.

The problem was that, at that precise moment, Chávez decided to make a surprise visit to the lands of his putative father, and in such an especial case, to be neither less nor equal to the ladies, the interviews with history had to be two instead of one. Almost nobody knows for certain neither where they spoke, how they spoke nor what they spoke about but it was clear that the current ruse was crumbling in plain view of the large following of this soap opera. If now Fidel was also accessible to the male occupants of the highest office in the sister countries; what new reason could they argue for not accepting amiable conversations between the old warrior and the presidents of the Dominican Republic and Honduras? It all seemed to go very well with Leonel Fernández but with Manuel Zelaya there were some problems of coordination. So much so that, while Fidel affirmed that he could not find any time to meet with the Honduran, [2] the latter sustained that the Grand Chief had deign to pose with his hat! [3] However, everything was fixed with a speed worthy of a better cause and Zelaya also had the honor of seeing himself praised by the following “reflexión” of Fidel’s, who took it upon himself to elevate to the sky and beyond his intelligence, his affability and even his being in Managua, as a child, at the precise moment when the Prophet pronounced one of his unparalleled discourses. Meanwhile, the comedy had to display its biblical face, and since nobody would believe a new multiplication of bread and fish, Hugo Chávez, in his role as the unfailing teller of such stories, had previously shown us Fidel Castro taking a walk in Jaimanitas; something that only he had the privilege and exclusivity to hoard in the graphic testimonies that no one else in the world could own. Nevertheless, he did not fail to qualify the walk as “miraculous” or swear that people “cried when they saw him”, even omitting the minor fact that the sacred mantle was in this case replaced by the Addidas sport wear. [4]

Venezuela: The People’s Struggle is the Best Response to the Crisis!

Thursday, April 30, 2009 (14:30:12)
* Soon El Libertario #56 will be available in the street and on the Internet (www.nodo50.org/ellibertario). El Libertario is the voice of free ideas and independent social movements in Venezuela and Latin America. As a preview of its usual combative, irreverent and uncompromising position with regard to authoritarian power and oppression, here's the editorial:

All thorough media analysts agree about the increased vulnerability of the Venezuelan economy to the consequences of the world economic crisis. The question is obvious: how could our country be one of the most affected by the pressures of the global capitalist system if it has been claiming to build its so-called "21st-century socialism" for a decade? The answer is simple: because, contrary to speeches and shows, it has not gone in any direction different from the economic globalization that has prevailed in the last two decades on the planet.

In fact, Venezuela has deepened the capital flow role assigned to it: the “safe and reliable” sale of energy input on international markets. In this way, the country has even increased its dependency on the foreign consumption of our oil, a basic requirement of the industrialization and development that has strengthened the world capitalist architecture since the Second World War. That's why in the State’s invigoration of mining, the so-called firebrands concerned with the promotion of a "endogenous" economy have demonstrated familiar results while supplying folkloric anecdotes to entertain the population. It’s also familiar that, each time the government declares that it's promoting "food sovereignty," it’s increasing the quantity of imported food, its only possible subsidy for which is oil profits.

Despite the major economic bonanza of the last three decades and having almost total control of all of the state political and institutional apparatus, the Bolivarianist government has been incapable of promoting the structural transformations that deserve "positive" as an adjective or of significantly improving not only consumption, which is a capitalist indicator, as we know, but also the majority’s quality of life. As an extension of the defects of representative democracy, not as a break with it, Chavism as it really exists has once again repeated the perversions of previous governments during fiscal booms: usage of a large client and populist network, the super-sizing of the institutional bureaucratic apparatus, the sudden and grotesque enrichment of a new bureaucracy in power and the fomentation of corruption at all levels of public administration. Now here we are in a lean period that will also have to bear the excesses of all the Juan Barretos and Diosdado Cabellos in red berets feeding off their respective ministries and departments.

As the Chavista pact with Gustavo Cisneros has already demonstrated, the crisis will lead to increased confrontations among the powerful, who will combine their interests while those of us at the bottom pay the price. This confusing and polarizing spectacle, however, will provide an opportunity for us oppressed to stand up for ourselves again by fighting for our rights without the “help” of self-proclaimed media representatives. In this necessary recomposition of the social panorama, antagonisms will rise to their real magnitude, and the rulers, bosses and privileged classes will take advantage of or bet on them because they have everything to gain.

In this context, the government is carrying out an aggressive improvement of its mechanisms for controlling the society and further concentrating its power. Taking advantage of the commotion and uncertainty of the world economic debacle, the government has a unique opportunity in the excuse of the crisis to implement authoritarian and regressive measures against labour, social and political rights. As has been mentioned before, the best way to keep our bearings and resist the State’s shock policy is to understand the nature and causes of what is happening to us. In the Venezuelan case, it's a burned-out political model—populist caudillismo, changes decreed from above—and an economic one—dependency on oil—which the so-called “Bolivarian process" has not remotely superseded but only sanitized.

However, this crossroads is also a chance for real and profound transformation of our society. Those of us at the bottom must dispense with opportunistic leaders and their short cuts and gradually construct a vast independent, belligerent and popular social movement beyond all political parties and agencies of power. We must dismantle the pseudo-revolutionary fallacies of the new State bureaucracy one by one as we reject the influence and actions of political parties inherited from the past. We must recognize all the factors that limit our individual and collective advancement and create proposals, not for taking power, but for washing the social fabric clean of it. We must promote experiences and initiatives that generate a different culture here and now and form non-coercive and horizontal connections and bridges with all sectors in the struggle.

The mobilization and solidarity of the people against the crisis of the elite!

El Libertario - ellibertario@nodo50.org
www.nodo50.org/ellibertario (in Spanish, English & others languages)
  • Posted by: Anonymous
  • Topic: Venezuela
  • Score: 0 / 5

No One to be Held Accountable for Torture

Thursday, April 23, 2009 (13:20:28)
The Obama administration has made it clear they are not interested in holding anyone accountable for torture, on the contrary, they will help shield people from accountability, going as far as to cover legal expenses for anyone who might be brought up on charges anywhere in the world. Here is an excerpt from Amy Goodman's column:

After President Barack Obama said there should be no prosecutions, he was received with great fanfare at the CIA this week. Mark Benjamin, the reporter who originally broke the Mitchell and Jessen story, said when I questioned him about Obama’s position: “If you look at the president’s statements and you combine them with the statements of Rahm Emanuel, the chief of staff, and Eric Holder, the attorney general ... you will see that over the last couple of days the Obama administration has announced that no one, not the people who carried out the torture program or the people who designed the program or the people that authorized the program or the people who said that it was legal—even though they knew that it frankly wasn’t—none of those people will ever face charges. The attorney general has announced that ... the government will pay the legal fees for anybody who is brought up on any charges anywhere in the world or has to go before Congress. They will be provided attorneys ... they have been given this blanket immunity ... in return for nothing.”

Torturers Should Be Punished


Source: Democratic Underground

Naomi Wolf makes an interesting point, that any prosecutions regarding torture should be at the top, with the Bush administration officials and lawyers who attempted to legitimize torture, rather than at the bottom, with the CIA officials who carried out the orders from above.

Don't Prosecute -- and Scapegoat -- Torture Operatives; Go for the Top

What do YOU think? Leave your comments below!

Obama Releases Bush Torture Memos, Assures No Prosecutions

Sunday, April 19, 2009 (16:22:47)
Source: Democracy Now! (w/ audio and video)

The Nuremberg Defense lives again. Be sure to leave your comments below. -Andy

AMY GOODMAN: The Obama administration released four lightly redacted memos Thursday from the Bush-era Justice Department that approved and provided the legal basis for the brutal interrogation techniques used by the CIA against terrorism suspects.

President Obama issued a statement calling for “reflection not retribution” and reassured CIA officials that they need not fear prosecution.

The so-called “torture” memos from the Bush administration’s Office of Legal Counsel were released as part of a lawsuit and Freedom of Information request filed by the ACLU. Three of the memos were authored by Steven Bradbury in 2005, then a lawyer in the Office of Legal Counsel, and one in 2002 by then-head of the office, Jay Bybee.

The memos dispassionately describe the use of tactics such as waterboarding, holding prisoners in small dark boxes, exploiting prisoners’ fears of insects, forced nudity, and shackling and depriving them of sleep for as many as eleven days. They also include extensive legal arguments as to why these tactics do not amount to torture under US and international law.

Jury Verdict for Ward Churchill

Sunday, April 05, 2009 (11:03:16)
“What was asked for and what was delivered was justice.” - Ward Churchill

On April 2, 2009 the jury returned a verdict for Professor Ward Churchill in his case against the University of Colorado.

The jury found unanimously that Ward’s 9/11 essay was a significant factor in the Regents’ decision to fire him, and that he would not have been fired but for his exercise of his First Amendment rights.

In comments made to the lawyers and on KHOW radio, jurors stated that they concluded that Ward Churchill had NOT engaged in research misconduct, and that the University’s accusations against him were essentially trivial.

They also reported having spent several hours debating damages, as five jurors wanted to give a substantial award but one did not. Because Ward Churchill had made it clear that this case was not about money, they agreed on the nominal award of $1...

Read more at the Ward Churchill Solidarity Network

For more background on this case, including the essay that started the controversy, see our archive's Ward Churchill section.

As Obama Hosts Summit on Healthcare, Marginalized Advocates Ask Why Single Payer

Monday, March 09, 2009 (14:41:05)
Source: Democracy Now! (w/ audio, video, and transcripts)

President Obama hosted a White House summit Thursday on reforming healthcare. While President Obama said every idea must be considered, the idea of creating a single-payer national health insurance program appears to have already been rejected. We speak to Harper’s senior editor Luke Mitchell, author of the article "Sick in the Head: Why America Won’t Get the Health-Care System It Needs."

JUAN GONZALEZ: President Barack Obama convened 120 experts to the White House Thursday for a summit on healthcare. Participants included doctors, health insurance companies, lawmakers and patients. Obama vowed to make passing healthcare reform a priority this year.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: In this effort, every voice has to be heard. Every idea must be considered. Every option must be on the table. There should be no sacred cows. Each of us must accept that none of us will get everything that we want and that no proposal for reform will be perfect. If that’s the measure, we will never get anything done. But when it comes to addressing our healthcare challenge, we can no longer let the perfect be the enemy of the essential.


JUAN GONZALEZ: While the President said every idea must be considered, the idea of creating a single-payer national health insurance program has already been rejected. White House spokesperson Robert Gibbs said Thursday, “The President doesn’t believe that’s the best way to achieve the goal of cutting costs and increasing access.”

Initially, no supporters of single payer were invited to the summit. After protests were called, the White House invited Democratic Congressman John Conyers and the president of the Physicians for a National Health Program.

AMY GOODMAN: Single-payer advocates have also been largely silenced in the media. A new study being released today by FAIR, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, found the views of advocates of single payer have only been aired five times in the hundreds of major newspaper, broadcasts and cable stories about healthcare reform over the past week. No single-payer advocate has appeared on a major TV broadcast or cable network to talk about the policy during that period.

Well, to talk more about this, we’re joined by Luke Mitchell. He’s senior editor at

Harper’s Magazine. His article in the February issue is called "Sick in the Head: Why America Won’t Get the Health-Care System It Needs."

Read more